Yeah I see the airfix 40b not to long ago, as with some of the airfix models the panel lines just looked a bit to big for scale for me. I must say this kit is very nicely detailed, there is a bit of making good early on as the tail has to be glued on separately to the fuselage as is the back of the canopy which is a bit strange.I'm really tempted by the Airfix P40B, in RAF desert camo. It's supposed to be a great kit.
That is how the 1/32 Hasegawa P 40 is tooled as well. Apparently that is meant to be a fantastic kit.As mentioned, the tail to fuselage join isn't a great flush fit so some filling and sanding will need to be done as was needed on the rear of the canopy, a bit strange and a bit of a pain.View attachment 296819
Firstly, nice job, I’ve seen that technique in the AK Aircraft FAQ book I have and frequently consult it for things similar to this.
My honest opinion is that it really depends on how good the decal is. I’ve done a sharks mouth once on an RAAF spittie and it looked fantastic with a decal, but the decal was cartograf. The question is this-was it worth the effort ie did it improve the look over the decal? If it did then it’s worth it. If it didn’t, in my own humble opinion it was a waste of time.
Edit-also, using a permanent marker definitely gives it a more inconsistent edge that is noticeable on close inspection
Cheers, John
Thanks for that, I think I just didn't want the old decals to go wrong after the last build so I went with the mask effect and it is a bit of piece of mind I suppose. It's a learning curve I suppose at least, hope it will look ok in the final reveal.It looks good Phil, but like John says did it make it look any better.
For FULL Forum access you can upgrade your account here UPGRADE