Dragon 1:32 Bf110D-3

  • Thread starter Airfix Modeller Freak
  • Start date
A

Airfix Modeller Freak

Guest
I did the Dragon Bf 110D-3 1:32 last year, but I never got to complete it due to it being destroyed (accidentally) :sad: . Now I am doing a new one with the full eduard interior PE set and I will be starting it tonight. Hopefully, I will finish it by the end of December as I am leaving for the Smithsonian in January to see various aircraft (especially the He 219 and the horten 229 parts that is in restoration) as a He 219 will be my next build. Now I am off to the hobby shop to restock on paints before I can start.....

John
 
A

Airfix Modeller Freak

Guest
A

Airfix Modeller Freak

Guest
Sorry for the late update. It has been a hectic week.

The PE construction was enjoyable and I used a PE bending tool by master tools-Trumpeter (Highly recommended due to it's value and not so expensive cost [$40 AUSD]). The only reason why I invested in aftermarket is because I will enter this in a competition in 2015. The PE throttles were really well detailed and additionally they were bonded with extra thin cyanoacrylate. The RLM colors for the inside was 10% flat black and 90% field grey (Gunze aqueous). Fit was generally good, but it was problematic around the nose and extensive filling was needed here as well. Thankfully, I managed to fix that up with thinned Tamiya filler. The detail in the cockpit however, was really great. Fit around the fuselage was excellent with the only filling needed was due to my oversanding which causing annoying gaps which was entirely my fault. It was bonded using Tamiya extra thin (excellent stuff). This is definitely the most detailed 'pit' I have done so far.

Cheers, John

View attachment 93654

View attachment 93655

View attachment 93656

View attachment 93657

View attachment 93658

View attachment 93659

View attachment 93660

View attachment 93661

View attachment 93662

View attachment 93663

View attachment 93664

View attachment 93665

View attachment 93667

View attachment 93668

View attachment 93669

View attachment 93670

View attachment 93671

View attachment 93672

View attachment 93673

DSC02658.JPG

DSC02659.JPG

DSC02660.JPG

DSC02661.JPG

DSC02662.JPG

DSC02663.JPG

DSC02664.JPG

DSC02665.JPG

DSC02666.JPG

DSC02667.JPG

DSC02668.JPG

DSC02669.JPG

DSC02670.JPG

DSC02671.JPG

DSC02672.JPG

DSC02675.JPG

DSC02676.JPG

DSC02677.JPG

DSC02678.JPG
 

BarryW

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
5,045
Points
113
Location
Dover
First Name
Barry
Excellent work - particularly with the pe. I really do not get on with pe myself, it is always a struggle and I just don't get on with it but you certainly seem to have the knack...
 
A

Airfix Modeller Freak

Guest
\ said:
Looking really good.Those Eduard PE instruments are superb.
Yep. I always find the Eduard PE products the best in the aftermarket products available.

John
 
A

Airfix Modeller Freak

Guest
\ said:
Looking really good.that PE work superb.look forward to seeing more, ;)
I could not had done it without the bending tool-the pieces were microscopic!!:mad:

John
 

Snowman

We come in peace, so shoot to kill!
SMF Supporter
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
1,996
Points
113
First Name
Gavin
Superb start!!

That makes me hopeful for when I start my Camberra B1 Mk12 using the Eduard cockpit kit!! (some time in the future)
 

colin m

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
SMF Supporter
Joined
Dec 26, 2008
Messages
8,608
Points
113
Location
Stafford, UK
First Name
Colin
Nice work John, great cockpit. I've used a bit of PE myself, and yes it can be an amazing pain in the neck, but does look great when installed.
 
A

Airfix Modeller Freak

Guest
\ said:
Superb start!!That makes me hopeful for when I start my Camberra B1 Mk12 using the Eduard cockpit kit!! (some time in the future)
I recommend to invest in a bending tool if using eduard etch. Over the years of using their detail sets, I have found a bending tool remarkably useful

John

Ok. Here is the next installment. Not much because I had limited time, but I managed to pre shade the fuselage and start on the engine. For an OOB engine, it is remarkably detailed. I painted the engine leads blue and yellow, and following reference by Squadron signal's walkaround, I painted some parts bare metal. However, I have a question for all of you guys and gals. Should I pose both engines open or one?

Thanks, John:smiling3:

View attachment 93774

View attachment 93775

View attachment 93776

View attachment 93777

View attachment 93778

View attachment 93779

DSC02679.JPG

DSC02680.JPG

DSC02681.JPG

DSC02682.JPG

DSC02683.JPG

DSC02684.JPG
 

monica

“When there's no more room in hell, the dead will
SMF Supporter
Joined
Oct 30, 2013
Messages
15,111
Points
113
Location
Melbourne
First Name
monica
looking nice John. ;)
 
A

Airfix Modeller Freak

Guest
The Engine is now finished. A great deal of work went into building it, but it was ultimately quite rewarding. I have decided to do only one engine exposed, as I am quite lazy and I found I took 5 hours to do a single engine. The engine bearers were drilled out to create a more realistic look and the various pipes and wiring was painted according to it's colour. The registration code for the engine was sourced from the decal archive. The exhausts are the only parts that is left.

Cheers, John

View attachment 93836

View attachment 93837

View attachment 93838

View attachment 93839

View attachment 93840

View attachment 93841

View attachment 93842

View attachment 93843

View attachment 93844

View attachment 93845

View attachment 93846

View attachment 93847

DSC02687.JPG

DSC02688.JPG

DSC02689.JPG

DSC02690.JPG

DSC02691.JPG

DSC02692.JPG

DSC02693.JPG

DSC02694.JPG

DSC02695.JPG

DSC02696.JPG

DSC02697.JPG

DSC02698.JPG
 
Top