1/32 HKM Do335 B-2 Zerstorer

Steve Brodie

SMF Supporter
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
3,734
Points
113
Location
Shropshire
First Name
Steve
superb work, as to be expected. how do you combat the dust on all your superbly built models ?
 

Jim R

SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 27, 2018
Messages
13,874
Points
113
Location
Shropshire
First Name
Jim
Hi Barry
As always a great build. All neat and sorted. Looks good under primer - shows how well the construction was done. The lights issue is rather a big mistake by the instruction writer and the proof reader :rolling:
Jim
 

Steven000

WWII and nuts.
SMF Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
1,946
Points
113
Location
Belgium
First Name
Steven
Looking good Barry, looking forward to the next step :thumb2: Quite a big model!
 

Vaughan

SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
2,707
Points
113
First Name
Vaughan
Barry that's one big bird you have there. Looking forward to the camo going down.
 

BarryW

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
5,045
Points
113
Location
Dover
First Name
Barry
Hi Barry, wow that is different, have to agree not a bad looking aircraft, I reckon we would of being in trouble, was that aircraft used as a in the tank buster roll with those huge canons on the wing give a good punch. Tony
There is a bigger cannon firing through the propeller Tony. .
 

Jakko

Way past the mad part
SMF Supporter
Joined
Apr 28, 2018
Messages
10,985
Points
113
First Name
Jakko
was that aircraft used as a in the tank buster roll with those huge canons on the wing
The intention behind the big guns on German fighters was mostly to shoot down Allied bombers, not to kill tanks.

There is a bigger cannon firing through the propeller
The wing guns on the B-2 should be the same as the engine gun: 3 cm MK 103’s.
 

stona

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
11,492
Points
113
First Name
Steve
Hi Barry, if you are doing the one visible in the instructions (M14, RP+UQ) the instructions have got the demarcation of the underside colours wrong at the back in the area of that ventral fin. The underside colour stopped just in front of the fin/back of the radiator intake bulge and gave way to the camouflage colour.

IMG_2453.JPG

There are a few photos that show this.

M13, RP+UP, which I did with the extended wing tips, was the same.
 
Last edited:

BarryW

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
5,045
Points
113
Location
Dover
First Name
Barry
Hi Barry, if you are doing the one visible in the instructions (M14, RP+UQ) the instructions have got the demarcation of the underside colours wrong at the back in the area of that ventral fin. The underside colour stopped just in front of the fin/back of the intake bulge and gave way to the camouflage colour.

View attachment 416470

There are a few photos that show this.

M13, RP+UP, which I did with the extended wing tips, was the same.
Thanks Steve. I will adjust accordingly.
 

BarryW

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
5,045
Points
113
Location
Dover
First Name
Barry
There is a mismatch with the camo pattern in the instructions. Having masked the wings, tail and nose I went up the sides and found that there was no way to carry on the pattern over the fuselage to reflect the plan view iIt was just impossible to reconcile. I suspect that the actual pattern is speculative anyway so I just worked it over the top is the best way I could. This means the fuselage behind the cockpit does not match but the rest does.

E4878193-6A39-41E0-A61C-C0B89A1C5F0D.jpeg

RLM81 done
07CCE84F-1E61-4254-9F77-74A9CE6CA14D.jpeg

Masks removed
E54D79F9-DC65-4C6D-912E-33EC460B7DCE.jpeg

I have a couple of corrections to do, the intake sides in particular. Then a little touching up and detail painting before I mask, to do the markings.
 

BarryW

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
5,045
Points
113
Location
Dover
First Name
Barry
On second thoughts looking at the photo it looks as if how I have done the intakes sides is correct (with the change pointed out by Steve done) and the instructions wrong....
 

stona

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
11,492
Points
113
First Name
Steve
Looks good.

To be fair I think the instructions have tried to follow the authorised scheme. This is from the handbook for the A-1.

IMG_2454.JPG
 

BarryW

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
5,045
Points
113
Location
Dover
First Name
Barry
Thanks Steve. The port side is close but the starboard totally different leading to the mismatch.

Now, to correct or not to correct?..... I will think it over. It is still somewhat speculative for this aircraft though.
 

BarryW

SMF Supporter
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
5,045
Points
113
Location
Dover
First Name
Barry
I decided not to change the camo pattern in the end and got on with some detail painting and then masked up for markings. In the process one of the cannons broke and I have decided to replace them with brass tube, two sizes ordered from John as I am not certain which will fit best.

There really is no excuse not to use masks on these kits. The masking job is so easy, straight lines and just black and white....

I cut up the side crosses to fit around the exhausts.
19BFB0D6-9D52-4563-B109-166F963C9F67.jpeg

68F48095-7577-4195-B3C8-E90721D18D78.jpeg

F49CC437-0838-4F92-A77F-8962FD6747A7.jpeg

361937FB-5146-4237-9748-87232A078CCE.jpeg

If you have not used masks do try them. I find masks a lot easier to use than decals with a better result.
 
Top