Mickc1440
SMF Supporter
Cheers Scottie, both straight forward builds oobMick,
I will follow along.
Cheers Scottie, both straight forward builds oobMick,
I will follow along.
Always welcome palMick,
I will follow along.
Cover my back ChrisI'm gonna loiter around the back of the room ..(I'll be keeping an eye out for matron wearing her parachute)... I've always wanted to build a Dak but never got around to it...
X1.8 works fine for me at 1/72..... On top of my expensive varifocals!!And all in braille scale I think I'm going to need the next step up from my optivisor
Not sure Andrew, new style boxes but no idea, I’m sure one of our more learned members will knowNot good Mick! Are these an older kit?
I’m not giving in JR, I was spoilt a bit with the F-16Damn that looks a bit much Mick, no doubt a twist in the body .Sure you'll sort it .
We're lucky enough to have the Dakota fly quite often around here as it goes home to its base. Looks really good when it does a fly by with the door open and a crew member standing in the door .
Just checked....2014, so pretty new....odd.Not sure Andrew, new style boxes but no idea, I’m sure one of our more learned members will know
I’m not giving in JR, I was spoilt a bit with the F-16
The rescribing isn’ Straight forward either Jim as several of the panel lines that cross the roof don’t join up. I’ll chuck some undercoat on and see what it looks likeFor such a new kit the seam problem shouldn't be as bad as that. You'll sort it, I'm sure, but a lot of filling and rescribing.
I have a mixture, Vallejo for open seams and Humbrol for jobs that need sanding, even got some Mr Surfacer. Just a pain that what’s bad on one isn’t on the other, the fight is onMick,
Seams are a pain mate. What filler are you using?
Mud covered defects are so underrated, I wish I could utilise mud more often.mud covered defects
For FULL Forum access you can upgrade your account here UPGRADE